Abstract
Introduction: Extractivism in southern Chile has generated deep tensions surrounding the Mapuche people's territorial claims and restitution. These processes, driven by economic logic geared toward capital accumulation, directly affect the ways in which communities relate to their territory and plan their collective future. From this perspective, it is essential to understand how extractive dynamics affect not only access to land, but also the possibilities for Mapuche self-determination. Development: From a political geography approach, and in dialogue with the concepts of value grabbing and pseudocommodification proposed by Andreucci et al., we analyze how current property regimes and land uses shape territories that serve the interests of capital. These configurations restrict material access to claimed lands and condition the basis for the development of their own political projects. Beyond the physical transformation of space, extractivism captures the future of communities by imposing rationalities of valorization incompatible with their historical and political trajectories. Using a mixed methodological strategy of exploratory sequential analysis and the layers of dispossession approach, overlapping trajectories of historical territorial dispossession and extractivist appropriation are identified that continue to influence current conditions of restitution. This framework highlights a legal geography that hinders the resolution of territorial conflict at the local level. Conclusions: The analysis allows us to understand that extractivism not only produces immediate territorial impacts, but also structurally limits the possibilities for future self-determination of the Mapuche people. Incorporating the study of claimed territories—and not only those formally owned—is key to broadening the debate on land grabbing in Latin America and advancing toward approaches to indigenous territorial justice.
References
1. Andreucci D, García-Lamarca M, Wedekind J, Swyngedouw E. “Value Grabbing”: A Political Ecology of Rent. Capital Nat Social. 2017;28(3):28-47. doi:10.1080/10455752.2016.1278027.
2. Apergi M, Eicke L, Goldthau A, Hashem M, Huneeus S, Lima-de-Oliveira R, et al. An energy justice index for the energy transition in the global South. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 2024;192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2023.114238.
3. Berthet E, Lavalley J, Anquetil-Deck C, Ballesteros F, Stadler K, Soytas U, et al. Assessing the social and environmental impacts of critical mineral supply chains for the energy transition in Europe. Global Environmental Change 2024;86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2024.102841.
4. Chagnon CW, Durante F, Gills BK, Hagolani-Albov SE, Hokkanen S, Kangasluoma SMJ, et al. From extractivism to global extractivism: the evolution of an organizing concept. J Peasant Stud. 2022;49(4):760-792. doi:10.1080/03066150.2022.2069015.
5. Chen L, Fang L, Yang X, Luo X, Qiu T, Zeng Y, et al. Sources and human health risks associated with potentially toxic elements (PTEs) in urban dust: A global perspective. Environment International 2024;187. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2024.108708.
6. Cuevas P, Calderón M. Extractivismo, patrón de reproducción del capital y renta de la tierra: propuesta teórica desde la economía política crítica. Cult Hombre Soc. 2025;34(2):1-36. doi:10.7770/CUHSO-V35N1ART640.
7. Doganova L. Discounting the Future: The Ascendancy of a Political Technology. New York: Zone Books; 2024.
8. Dunlap A, Verweijen J, Tornel C. The political ecologies of “green” extractivism(s): An introduction. Journal of Political Ecology 2024;31:436–63. https://doi.org/10.2458/jpe.6131.
9. Dunlap A, Werveijen J, Tornel C. The political ecologies of “green” extractivism(s): An introduction. J Political Ecol. 2024;31:436-463.
10. González F. Las dos transiciones en Latinoamérica: ¿bitácora de éxitos o de naufragios? Quórum Rev Pensam Iberoam. 2004;(8-9):169-182.
11. Hartinger SM, Palmeiro-Silva YK, Llerena-Cayo C, Blanco-Villafuerte L, Escobar LE, Diaz A, et al. The 2023 Latin America report of the Lancet Countdown on health and climate change: the imperative for health-centred climate-resilient development. The Lancet Regional Health - Americas 2024;33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lana.2024.100746.
12. Harvey D. El nuevo imperialismo. Madrid: Ediciones Akal; 2004.
13. Heseltine M, Clemm von Hohenberg B. Large language models as a substitute for human experts in annotating political text. Research and Politics 2024;11. https://doi.org/10.1177/20531680241236239.
14. Ho CQ, Tirachini A. Mobility-as-a-Service and the role of multimodality in the sustainability of urban mobility in developing and developed countries. Transport Policy 2024;145:161–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2023.10.013.
15. Jones MW, Kelley DI, Burton CA, Di Giuseppe F, Ferreira Barbosa MLF, Brambleby E, et al. State of Wildfires 2023-2024. Earth System Science Data 2024;16:3601–85. https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-16-3601-2024.
16. Julián D, Alister C, Sittel J, Schmalz S, Graf J, Landherr A, Castro F. ¿Precarización del campo o campo precario? Expansiones extractivas, capitalismo y precariedad(es) en La Araucanía. Rev Geogr Espacios. 2022;12(22):114-145. doi:10.25074/07197209.22.2114.
17. Baghino A. The Notion of ‘Future Threat’ in Chilean Jurisprudence: Analysis of the Protection Remedy in Defense of Indigenous Territories. Vergentis 2024:141–61.
18. Stephani E, Castillo Jara E. Collaborative renewable development in Chile: a new path forward for the Mapuche. Journal of Energy and Natural Resources Law 2024;42:381–401. https://doi.org/10.1080/02646811.2024.2356989.
19. Torres R, Azócar G, Gallardo R, Mendoza J. Water Extractivism and Decolonial Struggles in Mapuche Territory,Chile. Water Alternatives 2022;15:150–74.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2026 Duban Mardones Ahilla (Author)

