Abstract
This article analyzes the tensions involved in meaning-making processes surrounding death among individuals in contemporary Mexican society. Drawing on ten in-depth qualitative interviews, it explores the narratives of adults who experienced the loss of a loved one and engaged in processes of re-signification. The study is grounded in Peter L. Berger’s sociological theory of the social construction of reality and the notion of theodicy—the attempt to justify suffering and reestablish symbolic order in the face of the inexplicable. Two primary interpretive frameworks are identified: the traditional theodicy, rooted in religious systems that give death a transcendent meaning, and the secularized theodicy, supported by modern rational or scientific discourses. Findings reveal that contemporary Mexicans navigate between both models, generating a tension between the human need for symbolic coherence and the cultural fragmentation characteristic of modernity. Understanding these tensions highlights collective processes of re-signification that emerge in mourning contexts and underscores the need for a culturally sensitive psychology that acknowledges the historical and symbolic dimensions of human suffering.
References
1. American Psychological Association. Publication manual of the American Psychological Association. 7ª ed. Washington D.C.: APA; 2020.
2. Arias JJ. Cultura y psicoterapia. En: Símbolos y arquetipos en el hombre contemporáneo: Sistemas simbólicos, ámbitos y expresiones. México D.F.: UAM-X, CSH, Política y Cultura; 2003. p. 157–173.
3. Arias JJ. Mito, sentido y significado de la vida. En: Alma y Psique: del mito al método. México D.F.: UAM-X; 1993. p. 27–61.
4. Ariès P. Historia de la muerte en Occidente: desde la Edad Media hasta nuestros días. Trad. Fontcuberta J. Barcelona: Ariel; 2007.
5. Ariès P. Morir en Occidente: desde la Edad Media hasta nuestros días. Trad. Fontcuberta J. Buenos Aires: Adriana Hidalgo; 2007.
6. Baydala A, Hampton M, Kinunwa L, Kinunwa G, Kinunwa L. Death, dying, grieving, and end of life care: Understanding personal meanings of aboriginal friends. Humanistic Psychologist 2006;34. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15473333thp3402_4.
7. Becker E. The denial of death. Nueva York: Free Press; 1973.
8. Berger PL. El dosel sagrado: Elementos para una sociología de la religión. Trad. Rodríguez S. Buenos Aires: Amorrortu; 1981.
9. Berger PL. Para una teoría sociológica de la religión. Barcelona: Kairós; 1981.
10. Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol. 2006;3(2):77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
11. Bruner JS. Acts of meaning. Cambridge (MA): Harvard University Press; 1990.
12. Bruner JS. Actual minds, possible worlds. Cambridge (MA): Harvard University Press; 1986.
13. da Silva Cunha JH, Ferreira LA, Frizzo HCF, Galon T, Rodrigues LR. Meanings attributed to death from the perspective of oncology healthcare professionals. Revista Enfermagem UERJ 2021;29. https://doi.org/10.12957/reuerj.2021.52717.
14. Frankl VE. Man’s search for meaning. Nueva York: Simon & Schuster; 1984.
15. Greenberg J, Pyszczynski T, Solomon S. Terror management theory of self-esteem and cultural worldviews. Adv Exp Soc Psychol. 1997;29:61–141.
16. Haugan G, Dezutter J. Meaning-in-life: A vital salutogenic resource for health, 2021, p. 85–101. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-63135-2_8.
17. Jones EE, Crawley R, Brierley-Jones L, Kenny C. Continuing bonds following stillbirth: protective and risk factors associated with parental bereavement adaptation. Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology 2023;41:93–109. https://doi.org/10.1080/02646838.2021.1972951.
18. Leibniz GW. Essais de Théodicée. Amsterdam; 1710.
19. Meen G, Reime MA, Lindeman S, Selseng LB. Beyond troubled and untroubled positions–an intersectional analysis of siblings who are bereaved by drug-related deaths’ meaning-making stories about their deceased brothers and sisters. International Journal of Qualitative Studies on Health and Well-Being 2024;19. https://doi.org/10.1080/17482631.2024.2372864.
20. Neimeyer RA. Meaning reconstruction in bereavement. Death Stud. 2019;43(2):79–91.
21. Neimeyer RA. Meaning reconstruction in the wake of loss: Evolution of a research program. Behav Change. 2016;33(2):65–79. https://doi.org/10.1017/bec.2016.4
22. Neimeyer RA. Searching for the meaning of meaning: Grief therapy and the process of reconstruction. Death Stud. 2000;24(6):541–558. https://doi.org/10.1080/07481180050121480
23. Shahzeydi A, Dianati M, Kalhor F, Jazi ZH, Ghohroudi MF. First encounters with mortality: a qualitative study of novice nurses’ experiences with a patient’s death under their care in Iran. BMC Nursing 2025;24. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-025-04000-0.
24. Stålhandske ML, Ekstrand Ragnar M, Tydén T. Existential experiences and strategies in relation to induced abortion: An interview study with 24 Swedish women. Archive for the Psychology of Religion 2011;33:345–70. https://doi.org/10.1163/157361211X594177.
25. Velázquez Y. Los rituales funerarios, los ritos de días de muertos y la cosmovisión de los nahuas de Naupan, Puebla, en la actualidad [Tesis]. México D.F.: Escuela Nacional de Antropología e Historia; 1996.
26. Vescovi G, Corrêa MA, Frizzo GB, Dias ACG, Levandowski DC. Construction of Meaning in Pregnancy Loss: Qualitative Study with Brazilian Couples. Psico-USF 2022;27:515–26. https://doi.org/10.1590/1413-82712022270301.
27. Walker A, Thompson T. Muscogee creek spirituality and meaning of death. Omega: Journal of Death and Dying 2009;59:129–46. https://doi.org/10.2190/OM.59.2.c.
28. Wong PTP. Meaning management theory and death acceptance. En: Tomer A, Grafton E, Wong PTP, eds. Existential and spiritual issues in death attitudes. Mahwah (NJ): Erlbaum; 2007. p. 65–87.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2025 Marcela Rodríguez Velázquez (Author)